<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave&#039;s Place / Metamusing &#187; Valve Corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/tag/valve-corporation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog</link>
	<description>Life and times of a webgeek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m not buying Modern Combat 2</title>
		<link>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/2009/11/05/why-im-not-buying-modern-combat-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/2009/11/05/why-im-not-buying-modern-combat-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Destructoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first person shooter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infinity Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve Corporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/?p=2149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed Modern Combat &#8211; I played through and enjoyed the single player campaign, and I played a ton of multiplayer when it came out. I also enjoyed World at War, its sequel, and still occasionally play it online. I won&#8217;t be buying the sequel. This fantastic chart over on Destructoid sums up why: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed Modern Combat &#8211; I played through and enjoyed the <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000027c284" title="Single-player video game" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-player_video_game">single player</a> campaign, and I played a ton of multiplayer when it came out. I also enjoyed World at War, its sequel, and still occasionally play it online.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be buying the sequel. This <a href="http://www.destructoid.com/elephant/photo-m.phtml?post_key=154183&amp;photo_key=120522">fantastic chart</a> over on <a class="zem_slink" title="Destructoid" rel="homepage" href="http://www.destructoid.com">Destructoid</a> sums up why: this release is a huge middle finger to PC gamers. I&#8217;m not going to get all caught up in the nerd angst these moves by <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000032e5d7" title="Infinity Ward" rel="homepage" href="http://www.infinityward.com/">Infinity Ward</a> have provoked, I&#8217;m simply going to walk away from their product. I think they could basically care less &#8211; they know they&#8217;ll sell 10 million+ copies to console gamers. Good on them, they know their market. I think they&#8217;ve lost sight of their PC market though. Meanwhile there are plenty of other great modable, extensively multiplayer, , extensible, client/server <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000018f2f" title="First-person shooter" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-person_shooter">FPS</a> for me to choose from on the PC. Personally I think Infinity Ward should take a good look at <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000066e42" title="Valve Corporation" rel="homepage" href="http://www.valvesoftware.com/">Valve</a> and think about how Valve is succeeding in all the areas Infinity Ward is claiming are causing them to make these changes.</p>
<p><strong>update</strong>: There&#8217;s also a pretty good summary of all the downgrades Infinity Ward have applied to Modern Combat 2 over here on <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/11/pc-modern-warfare-2-its-much-worse-than-you-thought.ars">Ars Technica</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/2009/11/05/why-im-not-buying-modern-combat-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game finished: Shadowgrounds Survivor</title>
		<link>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/2008/05/22/game-finished-shadowgrounds-survivor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/2008/05/22/game-finished-shadowgrounds-survivor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gametap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal computer game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadowgrounds Survivor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video game]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/?p=1545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finished up Shadowgrounds Survivor this morning. It was on sale a couple of weekends ago on Valve&#8217;s Steam software distribution service for only $5. I had played the demo some time ago and liked it but hadn&#8217;t gotten around to spending the ~$20 to buy it, so when it came up for only $5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished up <a title="Shadowgrounds Survivor" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowgrounds_Survivor">Shadowgrounds Survivor</a> this morning. It was on sale a couple of weekends ago on <a title="Valve Corporation" rel="homepage" href="http://www.valvesoftware.com/">Valve&#8217;s</a> <a title="Steam (content delivery)" rel="homepage" href="http://www.steampowered.com/">Steam</a> software distribution service for only $5. I had played the demo some time ago and liked it but hadn&#8217;t gotten around to spending the ~$20 to buy it, so when it came up for only $5 I jumped on it. By and large the game is worth $20 though there are some annoying glitches to be found playing through it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an old school action <a title="Arcade game" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcade_game">arcade game</a> with some light <a title="Role-playing game" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game">RPG</a> elements layered onto it. The plot is a riff on the old &#8216;aliens that look like the aliens from the movie aliens attack a space colony&#8217; which has been riffed on any number of times, but it&#8217;s done competently enough and you can pretty much skip through it directly to the alien blasting action if you want. Controls are straightforward &#8211; mouse to rotate/aim and shoot and WASD/arrow keys to move your <a title="Player character" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_character">character</a> around. Over the course of the game you get to use and level up three characters &#8211; a marine with a lot of firepower, a drunken russian with a flamethrower, and a lithe little assassin with some stealthy and long distance firepower. There isn&#8217;t much variety in terms of enemy types, but the game is about the blasting of the hordes and this never bothered me. The graphics themselves are pretty good:</p>
<div style="margin: 1em; float: right;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Shadowgrounds1.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1f/Shadowgrounds1.jpg/202px-Shadowgrounds1.jpg" alt="The player electrocutes an alien." /></a>Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Shadowgrounds1.jpg">Wikipedia</a>
</div>
<p>There were two major technical issues with the game. The first had to do with the camera. Often as you entered a level the camera would swoop around in an in-game cinematic, and this would sometimes then get stuck in a weird location leaving you unable to see the action, or even worse, sometimes after the cinematic I&#8217;d find my character trapped in the level geometry and unable to move or stuck in a confined area. Reloading from my last save always seemed to clear this up. The second problem was worse &#8211; there is a known <a title="Saved game" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saved_game">save game</a> corruption bug with the game which would always happen as you transitioned into a new level and would crash the game. This one is really annoying. There&#8217;s a workaround to this problem on the forums over on steampowered.com that involves downloading known non-corrupt save game files. I suspect this one would have pissed me off more had I paid more than $5 for the game, but for what I paid&#8230;ehh, I more than got my money&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>Anyway, the game&#8217;s worth a look if you like action <a class="zem_slink" title="Shooter game" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooter_game" target="_blank">shooter games</a>. <a class="zem_slink" title="Personal computer game" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_computer_game" target="_blank">PC</a> only, price between $0 and $20 (it&#8217;s on <a class="zem_slink" title="GameTap" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameTap" target="_blank">Gametap</a> if you&#8217;re a subscriber) depending on where you pick it up.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin: 5px 0pt; width: 100%;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none ; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixie.png?x-id=35311b18-11ad-4a29-90f1-59e60aba0444" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metamusing.net/weblog/2008/05/22/game-finished-shadowgrounds-survivor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

